- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:52:08 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Am 16.07.2007 um 16:57 schrieb Julian Reschke: >> However, I do agree that this is not an ideal state of affairs. If >> there is consensus in the WebDAV community to do so, I agree that >> we should write up a formal extension to MKCOL that would cover >> all the other MKxxx's behaviors. However, I do not believe that >> belongs in CardDAV, it should be a separate extension that CardDAV >> can itself leverage. I would be happy to put a spec together on >> that (extracting the behaviors from the existing specs). > > I think that would be great. I think all we need is a request body > (XML + mime type) that will allow to specify a set of WebDAV > properties, including the resource type. Maybe send a POST + request body to the parent collection? POST seems to have been avoided by WebDAV to not interfere with webapps using the same URIs. But those days are over. //Stefan
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 15:52:25 UTC