- From: Paritosh Shah <shah.paritosh@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:39:43 +0530
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Hi all, There are a few inconsistencies in the way DAV:error is to be reported inside a multi-status response as per different RFCs. According to RFC3253 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3253#section-1.6 ) :- "In a 207 Multi-Status response, the DAV:error element would appear in the appropriate DAV:responsedescription element." (RFC3744 also follows this definition) Example - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3744#section-5.1.2 According to RFC2518bis (http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#pre_post) "In a 207 Multi-Status response, the XML element MUST appear inside an 'error' element in the appropriate 'propstat or 'response' element depending on whether the condition applies to one or more properties or to the resource as a whole" Example - http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-latest.html#DELETE-example Do both types need to be supported ( depending on the request - basic vs versioning ) ? Or, after 2518bis is published, would it supercede 3253's definition ? Thanks, Paritosh.
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 15:45:03 UTC