- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:07:57 +0200
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Tim Olsen <tolsen718@gmail.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Geoffrey M Clemm schrieb: > > All use cases below other than #1 require the locktoken. > > Cheers, > Geoff Correct. In all cases except #1, the state of the collection is changed, by replacing a binding (aka "path segment mapping" in RFC2518bis). Tim: speaking of which, was there anything in draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-18.html>) or draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-18.html>) suggesting something else? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 09:08:06 UTC