Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard

I certainly consider Geoff and Manfred part of the WG.  I don't think  
any of these were ignored my Lisa or me, I've read everyone one of  
them several times. I think that for WG did not come to consensus to  
adopt these into the WG draft.


Cullen <with my webdav WG chair hat on>


On Jan 19, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>
> the only reason why "my" draft doesn't contain resolutions for all  
> (instead of many) open issues is that at some point of time, it  
> didn't seem to matter anymore, as the proposals basically were  
> ignored by you and the editor. Should this change, I could and  
> would finish it.
>
> BTW: it seems that you don't consider Geoff or Manfred to be part  
> of the WG. I'd really like to understand how one could come to that  
> point of view (I'll remind everybody that Geoff is one of the  
> authors of many WebDAV RFCs, and that Manfred has offered a  
> complete rewrite of the locking sections a few months ago).
>

Received on Saturday, 20 January 2007 20:04:06 UTC