- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:10:50 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Yes, and I think that's OK for non-WebDAV clients. A client has to get its search results in some machine-readable form. (If the client were looking for human readable results there'd likely be a WebUI and no standards involved). So XML is adequate for that purpose, and why not "DAV:" and "multistatus". At least it's a schema we have some experience with. Lisa On Apr 27, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> I think that's a very important feature. There's no intrinsic >> need for SEARCH to rely on properties, and it should be valuable >> for a number of non-WebDAV use cases. > > True, but note that the DAV:multistatus format is mandated anyway > (and I think MS Exchange is doing that for it's "sql" grammar). > >> ... > > Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2007 22:11:00 UTC