- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:16:44 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Yeah, the section reference is wrong, I can fix that. I'll continue to use my own wording for the rest as it's not quite true that there's two different formats (I can think of three: empty body, 'error' body or 'multistatus'). Lisa On Nov 28, 2006, at 5:36 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > From <http://ietf.osafoundation.org:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? > id=238#c2>: > > Draft 16 added: > > "If a server attempts to make any of the property changes in a > PROPPATCH request (i.e. the request is not rejected for high-level > errors before processing the body), the response MUST be a Multi- > Status response (Section 13)." > > That's incorrect. The whole point is that in this case, the Multi- > Status reponse format is *not* the one defined in Section 13. So > please replace with the previously suggested text: > > "The response to a PROPPATCH request can be in two different > formats: should the server reject the request altogether (because > of missing access rights, failed conditional headers, malformed > request syntax, etc.), the status SHOULD be non-2xx HTTP status. On > the other hand, if the server did attempt the property > modification, the response status SHOULD be 207 Multistatus, using > the 'multistatus' response body format defined below (Section 9.2.1)." > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 19:16:54 UTC