- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:57:12 -0400
- To: "Tim Olsen" <tolsen718@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE2F27AD4.49145FD9-ON852571D5.00680C26-852571D5.00681D78@us.ibm.com>
Yes, the revised diagrams are correct.
Cheers,
Geoff
On 8/25/06, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
I believe in Example 1, the binding of C5 named E should be to a new
resource (e.g., C6), and C6 has a binding named B to C4.
In Example 2, the two new members of C4 should be new resources (e.g., C5
and C6), not C2 and C3 (that might have just been a typo). And the
binding of C6 named E should be a new resource (e.g., C7), and C7 has a
binding named B to C5.
So in each example, a copy never creates a binding back to an existing
resource, so 3 new resources would be created by the copy.
I see. (yes, the C2 and C3 was a typo).
So is this correct?
Example 1
+--------+
| |
| Root |
| |
| A |
+--------+
|
|
|
+--------+
| |
+--| C1 |
| | |
| | B |
| +--------+
| |
| |
| |
| +--------+
| | |
| | C2 |
| | |
| | D |
| +--------+
| |
| |
| |
| +--------+
| | |
| | C3 |
| | |
| | E |
| +--------+
| |
| |
+----+
COPY /A/B /A/F results in:
+--------+
| |
| Root |
| |
| A |
+--------+
|
|
|
+--------+ +--------+
| | | |
+--| C1 | | C4 |--+
| | | | | |
| | B F | | B | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | | |
| | +-------+ | |
| | | | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | | | |
| | C2 | | C4 | |
| | | | | |
| | D | | D | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | | | |
| | C3 | | C5 | |
| | | | | |
| | E | | E | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
+----+ +---------+
Example 2
+--------+
| |
| Root |
| |
| A F |
+--------+
| |
| +--------+
| |
+--------+ +--------+
| | | |
+--| C1 | | C4 |
| | | | |
| | B | | |
| +--------+ +--------+
| |
| |
| |
| +--------+
| | |
| | C2 |
| | |
| | D |
| +--------+
| |
| |
| |
| +--------+
| | |
| | C3 |
| | |
| | E |
| +--------+
| |
| |
+----+
COPY /A/B /F/G results in:
+--------+
| |
| Root |
| |
| A F |
+--------+
| |
| +--------+
| |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| | | | | |
+--| C1 | | C4 | | C7 |
| | | | | | |
| | B | | G | | B |
| +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
| | | | |
| | | +-------+ |
| | | | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | | | |
| | C2 | | C5 | |
| | | | | |
| | D | | D | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | | | |
| | C3 | | C6 | |
| | | | | |
| | E | | E | |
| +--------+ +--------+ |
| | | |
| | | |
+----+ +---------------+
thanks,
Tim
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 18:57:19 UTC