- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:57:12 -0400
- To: "Tim Olsen" <tolsen718@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE2F27AD4.49145FD9-ON852571D5.00680C26-852571D5.00681D78@us.ibm.com>
Yes, the revised diagrams are correct. Cheers, Geoff On 8/25/06, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote: I believe in Example 1, the binding of C5 named E should be to a new resource (e.g., C6), and C6 has a binding named B to C4. In Example 2, the two new members of C4 should be new resources (e.g., C5 and C6), not C2 and C3 (that might have just been a typo). And the binding of C6 named E should be a new resource (e.g., C7), and C7 has a binding named B to C5. So in each example, a copy never creates a binding back to an existing resource, so 3 new resources would be created by the copy. I see. (yes, the C2 and C3 was a typo). So is this correct? Example 1 +--------+ | | | Root | | | | A | +--------+ | | | +--------+ | | +--| C1 | | | | | | B | | +--------+ | | | | | | | +--------+ | | | | | C2 | | | | | | D | | +--------+ | | | | | | | +--------+ | | | | | C3 | | | | | | E | | +--------+ | | | | +----+ COPY /A/B /A/F results in: +--------+ | | | Root | | | | A | +--------+ | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | +--| C1 | | C4 |--+ | | | | | | | | B F | | B | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | +-------+ | | | | | | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | C2 | | C4 | | | | | | | | | | D | | D | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | C3 | | C5 | | | | | | | | | | E | | E | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | +----+ +---------+ Example 2 +--------+ | | | Root | | | | A F | +--------+ | | | +--------+ | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | +--| C1 | | C4 | | | | | | | | B | | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | +--------+ | | | | | C2 | | | | | | D | | +--------+ | | | | | | | +--------+ | | | | | C3 | | | | | | E | | +--------+ | | | | +----+ COPY /A/B /F/G results in: +--------+ | | | Root | | | | A F | +--------+ | | | +--------+ | | +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | +--| C1 | | C4 | | C7 | | | | | | | | | | B | | G | | B | | +--------+ +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | +-------+ | | | | | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | C2 | | C5 | | | | | | | | | | D | | D | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | C3 | | C6 | | | | | | | | | | E | | E | | | +--------+ +--------+ | | | | | | | | | +----+ +---------------+ thanks, Tim
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 18:57:19 UTC