- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:59:25 -0400
- To: "Tim Olsen" <tolsen718@gmail.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF42BA2B19.1354DB4F-ON852571D5.005BD567-852571D5.005D5530@us.ibm.com>
I believe in Example 1, the binding of C5 named E should be to a new resource (e.g., C6), and C6 has a binding named B to C4. In Example 2, the two new members of C4 should be new resources (e.g., C5 and C6), not C2 and C3 (that might have just been a typo). And the binding of C6 named E should be a new resource (e.g., C7), and C7 has a binding named B to C5. So in each example, a copy never creates a binding back to an existing resource, so 3 new resources would be created by the copy. Cheers, Geoff Tim wrote on 08/25/2006 12:27:52 PM: > Hello, > > I just wanted to verify some examples my team and I have some up > with with regard to COPY in the place of BIND loops. > > > Example 1: > > +--------+ > | | > | Root | > | | > | A | > +--------+ > | > | > | > +--------+ > | | > +--| C1 | > | | | > | | B | > | +--------+ > | | > | | > | | > | +--------+ > | | | > | | C2 | > | | | > | | D | > | +--------+ > | | > | | > | | > | +--------+ > | | | > | | C3 | > | | | > | | E | > | +--------+ > | | > | | > +----+ > > COPY /A/B to /A/F results in: > > +--------+ > | | > | Root | > | | > | A | > +--------+ > | > | > | > +--------+ > | | > +--| C1 |---------------+ > | | | | > | | B F | | > | +--------+ | > | | | | > | | +-------+ | > | | | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | | | > | | C2 | | C4 | | > | | | | | | > | | D | | D | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | | | > | | C3 | | C5 | | > | | | | | | > | | E | | E | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | > | | | | > +----+ +---------+ > > > > Example 2: > > > +--------+ > | | > | Root | > | | > | A F | > +--------+ > | | > | +--------+ > | | > +--------+ +--------+ > | | | | > +--| C1 | | C4 | > | | | | | > | | B | | | > | +--------+ +--------+ > | | > | | > | | > | +--------+ > | | | > | | C2 | > | | | > | | D | > | +--------+ > | | > | | > | | > | +--------+ > | | | > | | C3 | > | | | > | | E | > | +--------+ > | | > | | > +----+ > > > COPY /A/B to /F/G results in: > > > +--------+ > | | > | Root | > | | > | A F | > +--------+ > | | > | +--------+ > | | > +--------+ +--------+ > | | | | > +--| C1 | | C4 |--+ > | | | | | | > | | B | | G | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | | | > | | C2 | | C2 | | > | | | | | | > | | D | | D | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | > | | | | > | | | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | | | > | | C3 | | C3 | | > | | | | | | > | | E | | E | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | | | > | | | | > +----+ +---------+ > > > > Are both these examples correct? > > thanks, > Tim >
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 16:59:28 UTC