- From: Joe Feise <jfeise@feise.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:06:41 -0700
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: Suma Potluri <suma@soe.ucsc.edu>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote on 08/15/06 17:53:
> I believe this URL is not a stable reference, which a RFC would need
> to have. It looks like the GNU organization could update the
> algorithm and change the man page -- there's no versioning
> information or guarantee that it's a final version. It's also not
> adequate by itself as a normative reference because there are options
> like whether to suppress blank lines -- those options would have to
> be nailed down if the single point of negotiation is the MIME type.
>
> I understand that the GNU license allows us to copy the spec text
> entirely: the page you link to says "Verbatim copying and
> distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium,
> provided this notice is preserved. ". Still, that doesn't
> necessarily mean one can excerpt and rewrite the man page, nor does
> it mean that implementations can freely use the algorithm without
> being subject to other GNU licensing conditions. IANAL, but I worry
> whether using a GNU algorithm could mean that software written to
> conform to a PATCH specification would be forced to be open source!
>
> If you want to pursue using this diff format, we'd have to
> investigate these issues at some point.
diff predates the FSF and GNU by a large margin.
A quick search shows that the algorithm was implemented in the early 1970s and
described by James Hunt and Doug McIlroy in 1976 in a Bell Labs tech report:
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~doug/diff.ps
Bibtex reference (http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~doug/doug.bib):
@techreport{McIlroy76b,
author = {J. W. Hunt and M. D. McIlroy},
title = {An Algorithm for Differential File Comparison},
institution = {Bell Laboratories},
address = {Murray Hill, NJ},
number = {CSTR 41},
year = {1976}
}
It is my understanding that what is now called "normal diff" was the original
implementation's output. Context and unified outputs were added later.
-Joe
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 05:06:53 UTC