- From: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@wsanchez.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:37:34 -0700
- To: robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Jim Whitehead has in the past suggested that looking into this may be a good idea, but I don't think anyone has picked it up and run with it yet. Seems to me like it might be interesting to try putting something together; go for it! Subversion isn't a good example, by the way; it basically shoehorns it's needs into existing DAV specs rather than coming up with something new, but CalDAV is a good example. -wsv On Jul 5, 2006, at 1:35 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > i'm interested in associating meta-data with emails stored in a > central > repository accessible from multiple clients. on day i'd like to be > able > to share my mails and meta-data over the internet. > > but this is brings me to IMAP. as a developer, IMAP sucks. IMAP really > sucks. IMAP *really* sucks for so many reasons. > > it's a big, complex, obscure protocol. good secure server > implementations are tough to code available only in a limit number of > languages. it does too much. it's just not safely hackable. > > webDAV is cool. it's a modern hackable mashable protocol. running over > http means security, scalability, caching and mirroring can be left to > httpd. this is great if i want to share my email archives and meta- > data > over the internet. protocols have been successfully layered on top > of it > (subversion, calDAV for example). it strikes me as a good match for an > IMAP alternative whose strength is read only performance and > associating > meta-data with emails. > > has it been done before? is this just a crazy idea? > > tell me why it won't work! > > - robert
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2006 17:38:46 UTC