- From: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:43:47 +0100
- To: Wilfredo Sánchez Vega <wsanchez@apple.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Well, even if one did that, what is the point of telling the client that the server actually supports a method, only the send FORBIDDEN in every case? Regards, Manfred Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote: > > Well, a resource can return a FORBIDDEN response to (just about?) > any method and still comply, so implementing a method that you don't > want people to invoke is pretty trivial, no? > > -wsv > > > On Mar 15, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Manfred Baedke wrote: > >> A DAV-compliant resource has to support all methods defined in the >> spec with the exception of LOCK and UNLOCK. > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 22:43:53 UTC