- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:21:02 +0100
- To: Bernard Desruisseaux <bernard.desruisseaux@oracle.com>
- CC: CalDAV DevList <ietf-caldav@osafoundation.org>, Calsify WG <ietf-calsify@osafoundation.org>, WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Bernard Desruisseaux wrote: > > Julian, > > Thanks for your feedback! The idea to do an informal last call is > exactly to get this kind of feedback. :-) > > Lisa, Cyrus and I already discussed about the possibility of making > reference to RFC2518bis. We will consider your feedback on this issue. Well, and that's the problem. To provide that kind of feedback, I'll have to review the spec, and that's the one thing I really don't have time for during RFC2518bis' last call :-) > Meanwhile, it would be appreciated if you could elaborate some more on > the implication of referencing RFC2518bis instead of RFC2518 in CalDAV. > > Thanks, > Bernard > > P.S. I have printed rfc2518bis and will take the time to review it! Great! Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 15:28:53 UTC