On Saturday, 02/18/2006 at 08:27 MST, Geoffrey M Clemm/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS wrote: > I think the following addition would solve the problem. Following > the paragraph quoted below, add the paragraph: > > An exception to this rule occurs if the server performs "case-folding" > on the URL segments, e.g. considers the segment "AB" to be equivalent > to the segements "Ab", "aB", and "ab". In this case, A MUST contain > a mapping to B from one of the segments that are equivalent to "SEGMENT". That's good, but I think Jullian also included another example that wasn't case folding. It was the case of what Windows does with filenames with no extention. It accepts either george or george. (note the trailing dot) as the same file. I assume there are other cases that we haven't thought of. We probably need to make the wording a bit more generic, but we could use case-folding as an example. J.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2006 21:55:33 UTC