- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 13:12:10 -0800
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Also, should "[ "#" fragment ] " be part of the URL? It would have been if we'd stuck with Relative References. Why ?query and not #fragment? Lisa On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > That seems like the best path. Since we now believe we want to use > these in Destination and If header, as well as <href>, I'll define > that once in the document. I am not sure a term like "reference" > is the best term as it's so general, so here's another couple > suggestions > simple-ref > dav-reference > > preferences, anybody? > > lisa > > On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > >> Lisa Dusseault wrote: >> >> >>> According to the 3986 BNF, I can't see how the beginning "//" >>> doesn't indicate that the following string, up to the next "/" >>> isn't an authority. >>> relative-part = "//" authority path-abempty >>> / path-absolute >>> / path-noscheme >>> / path-empty >>> <http://rfc.net/rfc3986.html#s4.2.> >>> Lisa >>> >>> >> >> Indeed (you learn something new every day). >> >> I guess that's another reason why we really should use something >> like: >> >> Reference = absolute-URI | ( path-absolute [ "?" query ] ) >> >> Best regards, Julian >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 21:12:25 UTC