[Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2006-01-30 12:52 -------
Oops, argh, insert swearing here.  

While re-adding the PROPFIND requirement I guess it best belongs in the PROPFIND
section, so I put it there.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 20:52:47 UTC