[Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210

elias@cse.ucsc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|elias@cse.ucsc.edu          |lisa@osafoundation.org



------- Additional Comments From elias@cse.ucsc.edu  2006-01-20 12:35 -------
Currently clients don't have to check for this, because servers don't require
it. Changing this would require clients to check what they send, and therefore
risks breaking interoperable implementations.

Participants in the 20 Jan telecon agree that this restriction should be removed
in light of the above.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 20:35:43 UTC