- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:26:24 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177 ------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de 2006-01-20 11:26 ------- I din't have time yet to complete this, but here are some preliminary thoughts: We have 2..3 different usages of HTTP status codes with Multistatus: 1) Inside response/status This is the generic use case; the HTTP status codes should have the same semantics as per the base spec; meaning that some will not apply (such as Precondition Failed). This can occur on many methods as part of partial success/failure, and on PROPFIND requests. Note that the PROPFIND method description currently doesn't mention these codes at all. 2a) In PROPFIND inside propstat/status 2b) In PROPPATCH insude propstat/status In these cases, status codes just are borrowed from the base spec, and apply to operations on individual properties, not HTTP resources. Some more thoughts: - (as discussed on 2006-11-18) spec should be clear that if a recipient doesn't know what to do with a specific code, it should apply the base semantics for the error class (basically 3xx = redirect, 4xx = client error, 5xx = server error). - we probably also need to clarify what combinations of 1) and 2a) in the same response are legal. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 19:26:33 UTC