- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:22:18 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152 lisa@osafoundation.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2006-01-16 20:22 ------- I think these changes went a little far, and the security consideration I prefer to call out explicitly in the security considerations section. - This issue doesn't require us to remove the requirement for creating an empty locked resource that it "SHOULD default to having no content-type". Conservatively, I left that text in. - this issue also doesn't require us to remove the requirement for the client to supply a content-type when doing a PUT to a locked empty resource, in fact leaving this requirement in is important for ease-of-use, so that the resource does have a chance of getting a helpful content-type at some point. - The paragraph suggestd for the section on PUT doesn't have the SHOULD requirement we discussed so I changed the wording - this issue doesn't require us to change the SHOULD NOT for making getcontentlength writable. Again, important for ease-of-use if it's not explicitly against server policy. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 04:22:36 UTC