- From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:22:18 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152
lisa@osafoundation.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2006-01-16 20:22 -------
I think these changes went a little far, and the security consideration I prefer
to call out explicitly in the security considerations section.
- This issue doesn't require us to remove the requirement for creating an empty
locked resource that it "SHOULD default to having no content-type".
Conservatively, I left that text in.
- this issue also doesn't require us to remove the requirement for the client
to supply a content-type when doing a PUT to a locked empty resource, in fact
leaving this requirement in is important for ease-of-use, so that the resource
does have a chance of getting a helpful content-type at some point.
- The paragraph suggestd for the section on PUT doesn't have the SHOULD
requirement we discussed so I changed the wording
- this issue doesn't require us to change the SHOULD NOT for making
getcontentlength writable. Again, important for ease-of-use if it's not
explicitly against server policy.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 04:22:36 UTC