[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80





------- Additional Comments From geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com  2006-01-14 07:57 -------
As a minor stylistic point, I prefer to say: "This method is idempotent, but 
not safe", rather than "This method is not safe, but idempotent", as this 
emphasizes that the scope of the "not" is just "safe".




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Received on Saturday, 14 January 2006 15:57:49 UTC