- From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:36:08 -0800
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Somehow, we continue to seem to miscommunication - perhaps we are saying the same thing On 1/11/06 5:08 AM, "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote: > and therefore any change to RFC2518 should by > default be rejected unless there is at least consensus Let me comment on this in the simplest form I can. If bis is includes change A, yes we will need consensus for that change. If many people think that bis should include some other change X to clarify a problem/confusion seen with 2518 but bis does not include that, we will need consensus that bis does not include X. We need consensus on the document. Now to get to consensus, yes I encourage the WG not to add new features, and not to be shy about removing features that don't work.
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:35:59 UTC