- From: Michael Wechner <michael.wechner@wyona.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:58:35 +0200
- To: Manfred Baedke <manfred.baedke@greenbytes.de>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Manfred Baedke wrote: > > Hi Michael, > >> Also the server might want to deliver a different response, e.g. if >> the GET request is being issued from a regular Web-Browser, >> then the server might respond with a common (X)HTML, but if the GET >> request is being issued from Cadaver or OpenOffice then >> the server might respond with an ODT file. > > What about the Accept header? makes sense, whereas I need to check what OpenOffice for instance is actually sending, but see my other usecase re custom authentication. > >> because the server might be able to handle different versions of >> WebDAV. I think this makes sense >> for backward and forward compatibility reasons. > > Are there any specific incompatibility issues you are aware of ? no, but I could imagine there will be if there will be more than one version of WebDAV and so I think it should me mandatory for clients to send the DAV header. Cheers Michi > > > Regards, > Manfred > > > -- Michael Wechner Wyona - Open Source Content Management - Apache Lenya http://www.wyona.com http://lenya.apache.org michael.wechner@wyona.com michi@apache.org +41 44 272 91 61
Received on Friday, 30 June 2006 13:58:34 UTC