Re: Bug 143 (lock refresh), was: WGLC of draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-14.txt from Jason Crawford on 2006-05-12 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from April to June 2006)

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:34:21 -0400
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF481B1A35.5FFC3753-ON8525716C.0043DAB5-8525716C.00451052@us.ibm.com>

On Friday, 05/12/2006 at 02:04 ZE2, Julian Reschke 
<nnjulian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> > WG on Feb 20 which way we should go on this, and nobody answered.
> 
> That's correct, and that makes me really worry about the amount of
> review this is getting. Again, this is an incompatible change both to
> clients and servers, 

Is it incompatible?  Clients can use both approaches/headers at once and 
the server can respect which ever.  If in doubt it can respect the newer
spec since the client has demonstrated knowledge of that.  Right?

Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 12:34:48 UTC