Re: extend production

Thanks to both you and Jim; that's what I needed.

BTW, if 2518 is undergoing revision, the HTTP header registrations  
should be updated (or made; I think I see a new one in there?); see  
RFC3864/BCP90.

Cheers,


On 22/08/2005, at 2:56 PM, Joachim Feise wrote:

>
> Mark Nottingham wrote on 08/22/05 12:25:
>
>
>> Where is the BNF for the 'extend' production, used in section 9.1 of
>> 2518 -
>>     DAV = "DAV" ":" "1" ["," "2"] ["," 1#extend]
>>
>> I searched 2518 and 2068 with no luck.
>>
>
>
> Undefined in 2518, see http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm #49.
> It is defined in the current draft:
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-07.html
>
> -Joe
>
>
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 00:58:12 UTC