- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:14:14 +0200
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- CC: webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > The proposed additional text is fine with me, although I'd probably > delete the phrase "which in turn should define how the property value > behaves", since I believe it is redundant. > > Cheers, > Geoff Good point. New proposed text (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-latest.html#rfc.section.2.6>): "2.6. PROPFIND and Bindings Consistent with [RFC2518], the value of a dead property MUST be independent of the number of bindings to its host resource or of the path submitted to PROPFIND. On the other hand, the behaviour for each live property depends on its individual definition (for example, see [RFC3744], section 5, paragraph 2)." Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 July 2005 17:14:38 UTC