- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:24:20 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > My bad -- I don't know how I forgot that section 9 on relationship to > ACL had been added to the Bind spec. That did make things a lot better. > > I'm still concerned that the combination of ACL and BIND can't be > implemented interoperably, but I'm starting to agree with Julian that > the problem is in the ACL spec rather than the BIND spec. I didn't say that there is a problem with the ACL spec. What the ACL spec says about namespace operations probably is the consensus of the WebDAV working group back then; so if it makes a special statement about namespace operations, it makes that on purpose. > Are implementors agreed that when a resource is bound into a new > collection, that no new ACL initialization can be done? So if I bind a > resource into a collection that I share with Jim, and this sharing is > handled by initialization, the server MUST NOT alter the ACL such that > the resource is now readable by Jim? I think that would be a contradiction to what the combination of the specs currently say. Why would BIND have different constraints than MOVE? Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2005 17:24:29 UTC