- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:37:49 -0700
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, " webdav" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
At 8:17 AM -0400 6/16/05, Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > >So unless there are some actual technical problems with the REDIRECT >draft, I believe the current REDIRECT draft should go to "Proposed", >to address the interoperability in this area that already has arisen >due to the lack of a standard for how to author redirect references. > >In this case, since there aren't any subtle technical issues/obstacles >to be addressed, and we just need a common convention, I think it is >appropriate for the draft standard to drive the implementations, rather >than the other way round. Just as a quick clarification, am I right that you mean you want the current draft, as a Proposed Standard, to guide implementations? Because of the usual draft-vs.-Draft Standard, I could read your message to mean "wait until the Draft Standard conditions are met", and it seems safer to confirm your intent. regards, Ted Hardie
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 16:38:03 UTC