- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:22:07 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: 'webdav' WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > ... >>> we don't have the energy as a WG to finish that properly, it's my >>> opinion that we could instead bring BIND immediately to submission >>> as an Informative RFC, where it would be an exemplary and >>> high-quality example of that class. >> >> >> That would indeed be preferrable to doing nothing at all (although, >> shouldn't it be "Experimental" instead???); however I personally >> think that the BIND spec really should be submitted for publication >> as "Proposed" (in contrast to REDIRECT which *currently* seems to >> only have one implementation). > > > Sorry; you're right, Experimental would probably be better. REDIRECT > could also go to experimental immediately. I'd prefer it to go to "Proposed" (that seems in line with the Standards Process). Anyway, if you feel it's done, why don't you start a WG last call for it? Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 12:22:14 UTC