W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:59:19 +0200
Message-ID: <42931717.8040709@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: 'webdav' WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> A lot of it is described in here:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc- 
> shepherding-05.txt
> Other details depend on the AD.
> Lisa


I just read that draft. Questions:

a) Is this working group running under this process? If yes, since when?

b) Who are the document shepherds for the current working group 
documents that seem to be ready (BIND, REDIRECT, QUOTA)?

c) Section 1 asks...:

    1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members
         and key non-WG members?  Do you have any concerns about the
         depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed?

How is adequateness determined? And are there any suggestions about how 
to get review by non-WG members? Speaking of which, how is it decided 
whether somebody doing a review is or is not a WG member? For instance, 
when Roy Fielding was giving feedback on specific BIND issues a few 
months ago, was he doing this as a WG member? (technically, anybody 
participating in this mailing list is a WG member after all)

Best regards,

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 00:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:34 UTC