- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:59:19 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: 'webdav' WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > A lot of it is described in here: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc- > shepherding-05.txt > > Other details depend on the AD. > Lisa OK, I just read that draft. Questions: a) Is this working group running under this process? If yes, since when? b) Who are the document shepherds for the current working group documents that seem to be ready (BIND, REDIRECT, QUOTA)? c) Section 1 asks...: 1.b) Has the document had adequate review from both key WG members and key non-WG members? Do you have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? How is adequateness determined? And are there any suggestions about how to get review by non-WG members? Speaking of which, how is it decided whether somebody doing a review is or is not a WG member? For instance, when Roy Fielding was giving feedback on specific BIND issues a few months ago, was he doing this as a WG member? (technically, anybody participating in this mailing list is a WG member after all) Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 00:10:35 UTC