W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2005

Closing issues (was: Moving forward on BIND)

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:18:58 -0700
Message-ID: <426EB042.4070106@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: 'webdav' <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

> [...] most of the open Bugzilla issues should have been closed long 
> ago. [...]

After looking over them more closely, I agree with this statement (see 

> It's a shame that a new tracking system and last call procedure were 
> introduced, and then the WG doesn't stick to the process that was 
> agreed upon.

Agreed, however it may be best to get BIND out the door before expending 
any energy on process issues?  :-)

> I have trouble taking Issue 76 
> (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76>) 
> seriously; anyway I've replied to it and never heard back from the 
> author, and no votes are on it.

I have no objections to closing this issue, the intended bahavior seems 
perfectly clear from a reading of the two specs.

> Issues 77 and 78 
> (<http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77>, 
> <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78>) now link 
> back to 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-issues.html#2.6_bindings_vs_properties>. 

I am satisfied with the current resolution - if there are no objections, 
I would move that the existing language is sufficient and Issues 77 and 
78 should be closed.

Other currently open issues in bugzilla:
2, Bindings needs to completely describe how bindings interact with locks.
This issue appears to have been resolved, with clarifying text added to 
BIND. I move to close the bugzilla issue unless there is an objection.

5, Bindings and DeltaV aren't fully interspecified
See my subsequent message on this topic.

71, Clarify what servers may and may not do with privileges when BIND is 
See my subsequent message on this topic.

If there is further discussion on any of the above issues, please break 
it out into a seperate thread with the issue number and description in 
the subject line. IFAICT, the only issues that should still be open are 
5 and 71, addressed in my forthcoming missives.

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:19:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:34 UTC