- From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:25:25 +0200
- To: 'Webdav WG' <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
On Sep 29, 2004, at 16:12, Julian Reschke wrote: > It could be, but as no standards-track spec defines it, and it resides > in the DAV: namespace, it's invalid. Just out of interest: Is it stated somewhere in the spec that DAV: namespace'd properties are considered private? (again, of course this makes sense, but was not aware of this strict limitation) >> I guess this one is pretty clear, the response/href element is not a >> property and therefore doesn't clash with the prop/href XML element. >> The thing I miss in the spec is a statement that only direct <prop> >> children are considered properties in a <response> payload. > Why would that need to be stated? Because there doesn't seem to be an explicit explanation what a "property" wrt to the spec is. I had several discussions with developers which would suggest that "D:href" as used outside the <prop> element is also a "property" and I didn't find a proof or exact specification in the standard to answer that. While it is somewhat obvious for me, it doesn't seem to be so for others. > Hope this helps, Yes, thanks a lot! Greets, Helge -- http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/ OpenGroupware.org
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 14:25:57 UTC