- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:48:45 -0700
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: HTTP working group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Oh, bugger, never mind -- I was looking at the wrong section of RFC 3864. Status and provisional are not orthogonal at all. Why the heck was it written that way? Oh well... My suggestion remains though -- either create separate sections for each status type (so we can see which ones are miscategorized) or don't make any subsections at all (list all header fields alphabetically regardless of status). In any case, this was obviously a lot of work to prepare, so kudos regardless. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2004 01:48:57 UTC