- From: Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 09:57:29 +0100
- To: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 07:39:43PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > It's some time ago that somebody asked how servers implement this today. > I finally got around to write a test case (attached JScript), including > > 1) using a no-tag list If header, > 2) using a tagged If header, specifying the lock root and > 2) using a tagged If header, specifying the indirectly locked resource. Is your latter (2) behaviour defined by 2518 or 2518bis? I suppose both are equivalent by 2518 at least. > Results: ... > Apache2.0.50/mod_dav: *crashes*, see > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31183> It looks like the code path for indirectly refreshing the lock had never been tested in mod_dav, it has never worked AFAICT. I can't find any reports of this bug being triggered before, either, so I guess this is not the most widely used protocol feature... (I've made a new release of the litmus test suite which also includes a test for an indirect lock refresh for any others who are interested and can't run JScript: http://www.webdav.org/neon/litmus/) Regards, joe
Received on Monday, 13 September 2004 08:58:03 UTC