Re: GULP 5.6 vs issue UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (65)

I agree.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 06/12/2004 09:45:50 AM:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
> here are some actual test results:
> 
> a) Apache/moddav: allows UNLOCK on indirectly locked resources,
> b) Xythos: same,
> c) SAP Enterprise Portal: same,
> d) Microsoft IIS: no support for depth infinity locks.
> 
> Thus the current text in the issues resolution "Resolved that you can 
> specify any URL locked by the lock you want to unlock" does indeed 
> reflect current implementation experience, and this is what spec 
> revisions should be saying.
> 
> Thus:
> 
> 1) RFC2518bis should undo that change, and
> 2) GULP should be updated accordingly (I'll do that for my in-document 
> copy of GULP at 
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-locking-
> latest.html#rfc.section.C>.