Re: LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY vs RFC2518bis-05

Julian Reschke wrote:

> IMHO the only thing we should say is that LOCK without a request body 
> *with* an If header will refresh all locks on the resource identified by 
> the request URI (possibly deprecating the use of the Time-Out request 
> header here -- I don't think there's a strong use case for changing the 
> timeout after the lock already exists; and as far as I know existing 
> servers do not support it anyway).

Make that... "...will refresh all locks on the resource identified by 
the request URI that have been submitted in the 'If' header..."

Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 10:37:23 UTC