- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 16:37:02 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, nnw3c-dist-auth___at___w3.org@smallcue.com
Julian Reschke wrote: > IMHO the only thing we should say is that LOCK without a request body > *with* an If header will refresh all locks on the resource identified by > the request URI (possibly deprecating the use of the Time-Out request > header here -- I don't think there's a strong use case for changing the > timeout after the lock already exists; and as far as I know existing > servers do not support it anyway). Make that... "...will refresh all locks on the resource identified by the request URI that have been submitted in the 'If' header..." Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 10:37:23 UTC