Re (2): summary of BIND/RFC2518 status

Julian Reschke <> wrote:
> Geoff and I have volunteered to author a standalone WebDAV Locking 
> specification
Thanks, please do it.

> Unless people can think of new arguments, I'd propose that the WG simply 
> votes on the issue. To restate our proposal:
> 1) We will *not* add locking discussion to BIND (in fact, we may want to 
> remove some locking-specific preconditions).
> 2) We'll extract all parts relevant to Locking from RFC2518, integrate 
> GULP and resolve all locking related issues from the RF2518 issues list, 
>   and publish this as a separate LOCKING document (starting as Proposed 
> standard updating RFC2518).
> 3) As a consequence, the authors of RFC2518bis should remove the locking 
> part of the specification (once both RFC2518bis becomes a Draft standard 
> and LOCKING is a Proposed standard, it will be relatively simple to 
> advance LOCKING as well).
> 4) draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05 as published can be wg-last-called after 
> possibly referencing the LOCKING spec.
+ 1

Cheers, Edgar

Received on Sunday, 2 May 2004 16:31:18 UTC