- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:06:23 +0200
- To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: acl@webdav.org, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > I agree that it makes sense to remove the "protected" qualifier. > Julian: Can you take care of this? > > Cheers, > Geoff We're talking about ... <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-acl-latest.html#PROPERTY_inherited-acl-set> and Eric's request on the ACL mailing list (<http://mailman.webdav.org/pipermail/acl/2004-April/001815.html>). I agree that servers should be allowed not to protect that property. I'm not so sure about the best wording, how about saying...: To stay consistent with other property descriptions, I'd prefer to remove the word "protected" but also to add...: "Servers MAY implement DAV:inherited-acl-set as protected property." I'll make that change for now; if people feel we shouldn't make that change they need to speak up *now*, as we are currently doing the last edits on the *RFC* document which then will be published Really Soon. Regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 15:07:04 UTC