- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:08:54 +0200
- To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Am 04.04.2004 um 21:38 schrieb Patrik Fältström: > > On Apr 4, 2004, at 21:18, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> 3) Issues with the organization and writing style of the spec. BIND >> adopts the same editorial style as RFC3253; and as there has been >> only one WG member finding problems with that, it seems that there's >> no change necessary. If more people feel differently about that, >> please speak up. > > Let me phrase this differently: > > Will two parties which only read the text in the spec be able to write > code independent of each other which interoperate? The bind spec is in an excellent shape to make interoperability between two parties more than likely. And if people want to shoot themselves into the foot, there's nothing a spec can do to prevent that. //Stefan
Received on Monday, 5 April 2004 04:09:08 UTC