- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:43:18 +0100
- To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Ted Hardie wrote: >>ever, looking at <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt>, section 2.11: >> >> Updates >> >> Specifies an earlier document whose contents are modified or >> augmented by the new document. The new document cannot be >> used alone, it can only be used in conjunction with the >> earlier document. >> >>So maybe we need to leave it as is... >> > > > Why doesn't "augmented" cover this case? My reading of the text above is > that "it can only be used in conjunction with the earlier document" _for_the_ > areas_of_overlap. That is, you can update RFC XXXX and still have > material that is stand alone that is not overlapping with RFC XXXX. Well, that would make sense, but in that case maybe draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis should be clarified... Regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 16:44:01 UTC