Re: Bind issues

Julian's proposal sounds good to me.  I'm willing to help Julian 
write it.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 12/08/2003 04:27:52 AM:

> 
> Jason Crawford wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps another option is to create a separate rfc for GULP.   I 
assume 
> > it could be published faster that 2518bis and it could be referenced 
by 
> > multiple related documents without suggesting that it bears a special 
> > relationship with binding support.
> 
> I thought about that as well. How about a separate document called 
> "Locking Simplifications to WebDAV" that
> 
> - contains GULP
> - contains the locking clarifications from RFC2518bis (refresh, 
> lock-token header, submission of lock tokens)
> - contains the locking simplifications from RFC2518bis (lock-null)
> - contains the locking extensions from RFC2518bis as optional features 
> (DAV:rootlock)
> 
> This would become a Proposed Draft, updating but not obsoleting RFC2518 
> and RFC3253.
> 
> If we can agree on scope and procedure, I'm willing to help writing it.
> 
> Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>