- From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:46:46 -0500
- To: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
The only changes I saw that needed to be rolled back were those in section 9.2. Were there any others? Cheers, Geoff Julian wrote on 12/03/2003 10:08:46 AM: > > Hi, > > I have updated the "latest" draft at > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering- > protocol-latest.html> > to include the editorial changes made by the RFC-Editor. > > To potential reviewers: this is absolutely the last opportunity to > complain about editorial issues. > > Note that some of those may be rolled back as they seem to change the > intended meaning of the text. > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 11:46:48 UTC