I agree that this would be an improvement over the OPTIONS technique. Cheers, Geoff > Julian Reschke wrote: > > > ...see > > <http://www.sharemation.com/~milele/public/dav/draft-dusseault- > http-patch-00.txt> > > Here's another thought. You could get rid of any changes to OPTIONS > altogether by specifying: > > A PATCH request with no or unknown content type must result in a 4xx > status, and a "Patch" response header summarizing the supported content > types. Then a client can simply submit a PATCH request with no > Content-Type header (and no body) to get the list of supported types. > > I think this would be a good simplification as it makes PATCH > independant of all other HTTP methods. > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 09:23:36 UTC