Re: Bindings and GULP again

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> No problem here, we all agree that lock tokens must be tagged with
> the right URI (or untagged). Otherwise you'd get 412 Precondition 
> Failed.  This hasn't changed in RFC2518bis, but if the language is
> unclear I'm happy to take a look.

No, that's fine. I just confused changes that are useful and we agreed 
upon and others I *thought* went in that were still under discussion.

If this shows anything, it's that we better finish discussions, then 
resolve the issues and document it :-)

Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:58:57 UTC