- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:49:21 +0100
- To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>, 'Webdav WG' <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Stefan Eissing wrote: >> In RFC2518bis, a lock token is submitted if it appears anywhere >> in the if header, I think. >> [...] > > > I agree to that view on submitted lock-tokens. In this, GULP needs a > simplification. Clarification: I confused "being submitted for LOCK evaluation" with the If header handling. So yes, GULP should state that a lock token is submitted when it appears in the If header at all. However, this doesn't mean that for "If" header processing, lock tokens can be supplied un-tagged or with the wrong URI. I'm mentioning this because that would be a change from RFC2518, and I don't think we've reached consensus on that. > ... Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 05:50:21 UTC