- From: Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 16:41:15 -0800
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Lisa, My reading of this is the same as Julian's. The URI RFC stipulates the admissible syntax of URIs, with a modest variety of flavors. None of the rules currently allow "DAV:" as a valid URI form. And the editor of their -bis document has accepted a modification that allows the empty part. Julian, I think a bigger part of the change control has to do with use of a DAV URI as a namespace identifier. Something similar should be stated in that respect, along with the condition on who gets to create URIs in the DAV scheme. I think that means I am also aligned with what you say about defining the "namespace" in your other note with this subject line. -- Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 14:27 To: Lisa Dusseault Cc: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: Re: rfc2518bis issue 03-C03 - DAV: Scheme Lisa Dusseault wrote: >>2. The form "DAV:" is not an acceptable form for a URI >>according to the URI format specifications, although the >>editors of the URI specification revision have accepted the >>request to allow that form. > > > I would be surprised to hear this -- I'd like to see what <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2001OctDec/0193.html> It should also be mentioned in: <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> > makes it unacceptable. I agree it's not well specified, so to It isn't an absolute URI because absolute URIs have non-empty scheme-dependant parts. It's not a URI reference either because it contains an unescaped ":". Again - see the entries on the issues lists for RFC2396 and RFC2518. [ ... ] > There isn't anything > written down, however, about how to construct valid URIs using > the DAV: scheme. ...because we are too lazy, and this doesn't seem to be an issue. What we *should* state is: only WebDAV WG standard tracks documents may define/use new URIs in the DAV: scheme (that's the "change control" part). Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2003 19:41:26 UTC