Re: Depth header in PROPPATCH method

Julian,

This seems to say that there are some confusions among
implementers on whether a Depth on PROPPATCH is
acceptable or not!

Thx,

-Stanley

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: Depth header in PROPPATCH method


> 
> > I'd assume that most of the servers will ignore the header upon
> > PROPPATCH, thus rejecting the message may cause interoperability
> > problems. So maybe RFC2518bis should clarify this?
> 
> I seem to recall Lisa Dusseault talking about how painful it was for
> Exchange to implement Depth/PROPPATCH behavior, and hence I suspect there
> are some servers that do implement this capability.
> 
> - Jim
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 13:13:13 UTC