Re: [ACL] RE: ANNOUNCE: ACL draft to WebDAV working group last call

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu> · Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:36:14 -0700

Accidentally caught by the spam filter.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Sung Kim [mailto:hunkim@soe.ucsc.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:26 PM
To: Eric Sedlar
Cc: Julian Reschke; Geoffrey M Clemm; 'Ted Hardie'; acl@webdav.org;
acl-bounces@webdav.org; Lisa Dusseault; 'Webdav WG'; 'Jim Whitehead'
Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: [ACL] RE: ANNOUNCE: ACL draft to WebDAV
working group last call

+1

--
Sung Kim <hunkim@cse.ucsc.edu>
http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~hunkim

 "Dreams become reality!"

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Eric Sedlar wrote:

> +1
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Geoffrey M Clemm
>   To: Julian Reschke
>   Cc: 'Ted Hardie' ; acl@webdav.org ; acl-bounces@webdav.org ; Lisa
Dusseault ; 'Webdav WG' ; 'Jim Whitehead'
>   Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:23 PM
>   Subject: Re: [ACL] RE: ANNOUNCE: ACL draft to WebDAV working group last
call
>
>
>
>   Julian wrote on 10/06/2003 02:16:32 PM:
>
>   > > From: Lisa Dusseault
>   ...
>   > > suggestion to add write-collection
>   > >    --> no support voiced in response
>   >
>   > I may have missed this one: isn't this simply DAV:bind?
>
>   The proposed "write-collection" was DAV:bind + DAV:unbind.
>   This is easily achieved by having the client just specify
>   DAV:bind and DAV:unbind, and so does not warrant its own
>   privilege.
>
>   > > I don't think any of these prevent the document from going forward
after
>   > > last call finishes so if there is disagreement please raise it on
the
>   > > acl list.
>   >
>   > Agreed.
>
>   +1
>
>   Cheers,
>   Geoff
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
>   acl mailing list
>   acl@webdav.org
>   http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/acl
>