- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:53:27 +0200
- To: "Nevermann, Dr., Peter" <Peter.Nevermann@softwareag.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Nevermann, Dr., Peter > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 5:24 PM > To: 'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org' > Subject: BIND: precondition DAV:locked-overwrite-allowed > > > Some time ago, I asked what status code should a BIND request > return, if the > precondition > DAV:locked-update-allowed is violated. Apparently, there has been > consensus > in that is should be: > 423 "Locked" with <D:error><D:locked-update-allowed/></error> in the > response-body > What if DAV:locked-overwrite-allowed is violated? It could be: > 1) 423 "Locked" with <D:error><D:locked-overwrite-allowed/></error> in the > response-body > 2) 409 "Conflict" with > <D:error><D:locked-overwrite-allowed/></error> in the > response-body > Isn't 2) more reasonable in this case, because this time it is not the > resource identified by the request URI which is locked? Agreed. -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 05:53:46 UTC