- From: Dyer, Kevin <kevin.dyer@matrixone.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:15:19 -0500
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 22:15:27 UTC
Julian, I agree with 1) on 2) are you talking about quotas? If so you are correct but disk space is still 507, IMHO. Kevin >-----Original Message----- >From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:15 AM >To: WebDAV >Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-01.txt > > > >Brian, > >here are two more issues I have: > >1) During the discussion, I've seen soft limits (quotas) and >hard limits >(disk space) used in the same context. I'm really not sure >that it is a good >idea to use the same mechanism for both. > >2) Related to that: I'm not sure that using 507 for failures >due to quota >restrictions is a good idea. 5xx indicates a server error. >In this case, the >problem is not causes by the server, but by the client >(trying to take up >more space than allowed), so a 4xx with a new precondition >code seems to be >more appropriate. > >Julian > >-- ><green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 22:15:27 UTC