Re: bind draft issues

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:18  AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> Brian:
>
> These are the kinds of issues that led us to remove any discussion
> of PROPFIND from the bindings draft.  My conclusion is that our best
> approach is to leave it up to 2518bis to define generically
> how property values behave in the presence of multiple URL mappings
> to the same resource (since that is base WebDAV functionality, not
> something introduced by the binding spec), and the binding draft
> will focus on the semantics it introduces (such as the DAV:resource-id
> property, whose behavior in the presence of multiple URL mappings is
> defined).
>
> The binding spec can then focus on the semantics that it is 
> introducing,
> i.e. client creation of multiple URL mappings, the resource-id 
> property,
> and atomic MOVE/DELETE via REBIND/UNBIND.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Geoff,

I doubt the consensus would be any easier to reach for text to go
into 2518bis.  The text has to go into at least one of the documents
tho', so it's a good we're having this discussion.

-brian
briank@xythos.com

Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 15:05:21 UTC