- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:22:41 +0100
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Cc: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I think GULP should, with the proposed changes, go into RFC2518 bis. LOCKing semantics need to be defined in 2518bis and not in any side-track specification (sorry Goeff ;). //Stefan Am Freitag, 07.03.03, um 15:23 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Julian Reschke: > > Hi. > > I'd really like to see some progress regarding this issue. In > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/0281.html > > I have tried to rephrase GULP so that it doesn't require the term > "binding" > anymore. This should address the concerns of those who fear that a > dependency on the BIND spec is introduced. > > To those who did object to GULP being part of RFC2518bis *please* > review > this? > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 11:23:06 UTC